Friday, December 6, 2024

Musitorial - Tin Soldiers

 

Musitorial n mashing music, musings and editorials, music and song that evokes thought and commentary.

Next week’s (Dec. 9 2024) musitorial is inspired by the evening newscasts this past week. Headline events were not singular to this week but practically every week.

“One Tin Soldier” was used in the film The Legend of Billy Jack (1969), which I recall as a kind of rallying cry to young people of my generation who saw the deep flaws in Western societies during the Vietnam War era. The song’s sentiment goes beyond Vietnam, of course, and was for a short time a kind of mantra of the anti-war movement of the day. Sadly, world events haven’t changed all that much.

I’ve included just the refrain below, but hear (pun intended) is a link to the recording (on YouTube) and one to info about the film. If you’d like to see my editorial on the ebb and flow of international aggression, see https://mike-r-hunter.blogspot.com/2024/11/essay-ebb-and-flo-hapless-romantics.html

Link to the song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDeRkJcFBOg

Link to info about the film: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Jack

“One Tin Soldier” (The Legend of Billy Jack) lyrics © Universal Music Publishing Group (1969)

Recorded by Coven; songwriters, Brian Potter / Dennis Earle Lambert

Refrain:

Go ahead and hate your neighbor

Go ahead and cheat a friend

Do it in the name of heaven

You can justify it in the end

There won't be any trumpets blowing

Come the judgment day

On the bloody morning after

One tin soldier rides away

=30=

Monday, November 25, 2024

Essay – “Ebb and Flo,” Hapless Romantics

 

If I could draw people – if I could draw anything at all, for that matter – I think I’d create a pair of comic-strip characters who I’d name Ebb and Flo. Modelled both pictorially and editorially after Herman, by the late Jim Unger, Ebb and Flo would editorialize current affairs by imagining the effects of the world on the couple as representatives of the hapless and hopeless among us.

Ebb and Flo would allow me to characterize our world in subtle ways. They’d enable me to explore the murky depths of our 21st-century human condition. Obviously, Flo would be the sensible, stable partner to Ebb’s masculine misadventures.

Take as a sample subject the ironies that sometimes emerges through the urban-rural divide – especially the ways that divide reveals itself through political dynamics. Make no mistake, there is an urban-rural divide, and it gets studied a lot – including by me in another life – and is often referred to as centre-periphery dialectics.[1]

While this realm of study doesn’t have a whole lot to do with my characters, Ebb and Flo, it does have a great deal to do with the ebb and flow of culture. Attitudes, ideas, social mores and education differ between urban and rural sensibilities, and the ways of the world in general.

I’ve long been fascinated by an idea that Western civilization in North America – both urban and rural – tends to emulate the tides. Supposedly, Europeans (and their influences) encroached on the Americas from east to west – though I often wish we would consider the possibility that “civilization” (as we are indoctrinated to call it) actually developed west to east. To that way of thinking, migrant ancients from what we know as the Americas resettled and developed Eurasia. Maybe the ancients we have come to know as indigenous to the Americas were first, people who in their wisdom declined to migrate across the Atlantic, in favour of the natural riches they already enjoyed here, preserving their traditional ways to great satisfaction, advantage and longevity. In that imaginable scenario they were later (re)colonized when their now “civilized” descendants ran out of room and resources and sought to reclaim the motherlands – to reclaim their indigenous inheritance of resources.

If archaeologist Paulette Steeves[2] is right, and indigenous peoples have called this continent home for as long as 120,000 years, is it not possible that civilization as we know it began right here? A human tide that ebbed and flowed. Just a thought.

But that thought is not the topic of this essay but the notion of tidal and human ebb and flow is (the topic).

Accepting the recorded history of North America, we see that the newcomers (Europeans) arrived on the eastern seaboard and as we increasingly (and greedily) sought more room and resources we flowed gradually westward like an incoming human tide.

The first wave or waves populated and exploited the most desirable lands of this frontier according to the mode of transportation available at the time. So, starting at the waters’ edge, each successive human wave accessed and exploited prime lands and locales. They (we) occupied those prime lands and waters to their limits, and migrants pushed a little farther westward. Flow, settle, exploit, repeat.

Each wave increased the wealth of those who were first; they became centres of wealth and power – the front tier of development. Those who followed had no choice but to exploit the next tier, sometimes referred to as the back tier. With each wave, and with each advance and innovation of transportation and communication, successive waves pushed farther and farther westward until barred from further exploitation by the Pacific Ocean.

Now what? The edge of the continent could not stem the continuous flow of westward migration of those who followed from the east. While picturing this flow, consider the western spread of daylight and warmth with the globe’s rotation, as though preceding migrant peoples and prosperity westward.

Continuing with the metaphor of the tides, imagine for a moment what happens when a pan of water sets up a wave motion. When a wave has gone as far as it can go it flows back. So do we humans, which must be very confusing to wildlife that in their state of nature endure encroachment and all the destructive forces that go with it, followed by a period of calm as people get settled, and then … we’re ba-ack!

During the recent (2019-20223) COVID-19 pandemic (or is that panic?) many areas in the east saw a large wave of people return from the west, an influx (maybe that’s re-flux) of people seeking to get out of the path of each wave of illness. (Maybe that’s where the word pathogen comes from.) So, thousands of urbanites wishing to reduce their exposure flowed rurally, from centre to periphery. The efficiencies and wealth found at the centre suddenly became less desirable and the sometimes bucolic peripheral countryside became desirable. People and wealth flowed back like the water in the pan.

Fortunately, or unfortunately, the backflow didn’t last for a lot of the panicked pandemic migrants. Initially caught up in the attraction of calmer waters, a great many urbanites couldn’t anchor, and they drifted back to more familiar (more urban) territory. Accustomed to pace and quantity, like so many others, urban escapees couldn’t handle the peace and quiet. In their wake, like so much flotsam and jetsam, we rural dwellers are left shaking our collective heads in disbelief and wonder. Among the things that have bobbed to the surfaced after the flood is our taxes. Property taxes are pegged to real estate value – perceived value, that is – not to the services those taxes pay for. Inflated demand, inflated prices, inflated taxes. But that’s another day’s rant.

~~

Instead, I want to focus just on the idea that there is an ebb and flow to a great many things. That doesn’t mean we should favour nihilism – the “what will be will be” or “what goes around comes around” philosophies of life – because each rise and fall is just a little changed. We must consider that. Each arc of even the most balanced of pendulums must decay ever-so-slightly, if imperceptibly.

Have you taken note of recent local vs global rebellions taking place in some popular European tourist sunspots (pun intended)? Fed up with waiting in long lines to pay high prices for local service, small “gangs” of “locals” have taken to disgorging tourists from outdoor cafés and bars by shooting at them with squirt guns![3] (Is it bad that I found this to be rather funny?)

Frustratingly, as much as we know from previous swings of the pendulum – we don’t always heed the fact that “we’ve been here before.”

Take conflict, for example – perhaps as a prime example. With all that history teaches us, how can we not have learned that aggression comes back to bite? Given what we know of multi-generational trauma, how can we not have learned how to avoid war? How can anyone ignore the fact that every bullet fired ricochets – albeit metaphorically – and injures the aggressor?

~~

At the apex of each swing of the pendulum, the tide turns. History repeats itself. When Franz Kafka was asked about the seeming hopelessness of his vision for the world, he said: “Oh, there is hope, an infinite amount of hope, just not for us.”[4]

It doesn’t do anyone any good to perpetuate conflict. Advance, defend, repeat. We have but a moment, a split second, to alter that course, to set in motion a revised trajectory. In Canada we are learning. Through our actions (and inactions) with respect to Indigenous rights, mental well-being, human health, our changing climate, etc., etc., the pendulum pauses, if only for a moment.

What I really want to get to is the spiralling decay of global relations, the inability of our salaried leaders to cope with the apex of the pendulum of their powers, and therefore engage, like adolescents, in risky behaviour. Beware the pendulum, it swings for thee.

How can the leaders and commanders on all sides of conflict not comprehend that every bullet, every injury, every death comes back to haunt us. I say ‘us’ because in sometimes roundabout ways, all have had a role to play in this. Each time we pull the trigger, each trauma inflicted on another contributes to trauma that will fester and foster retaliation. Even if the immediate cause is long forgotten, the id does not forget. Remember the adage, “the sins of the fathers who hate.”[5]

Every terror-stricken or orphaned child is a ticking timebomb – on all sides. If, as I suggest, every belligerent act is predictably met with defensiveness manifest in aggression, if that is inevitable, should our leaders not be choosing a different path? To my mind, every bullet fired is fired against the gunman and against one’s own. As oft quoted editorial artist Walt Kelly said through his Pogo comic strip, “I have seen the enemy, he is us.”

Masquerading as civilized, cultures will forever be on the defensive, dooming this and future generations to be forever looking over their shoulders, forever suspicious of anyone and everyone. And I repeat, this applies to all the parties. The pendulum tolls “for thee.”[6]

Do aggressors think they can defy the laws of physics by turning back the clock? Like the pendulum, history doesn’t repeat itself precisely. Beware the folly of pretending it does. The circumstances surrounding contemporary conflicts are different, but at least one common outcome is assured: years of trauma that will surface time and time again, causing more death and destruction without end, amen.

~~

What of my characters, Ebb and Flo? It’s true that they are still in development, I still have to find an artist to take up the cause, but everyone is so darned busy trying to just stay afloat. We just have to wait our turn, we three, and hope that the pendulum keeps on swinging and that the powers that be can catch it at the right moment and give us some hope. Everything flows and nothing abides.”[7]

=30=



[1] The rural-urban divide is sometimes debated as dialectic – a method of determining the interrelationship of ideals in “light of a single principle” (e.g., black and white). By making logical and methodological comparisons we can fairly examine two sides of a story or theory. William, R. 1983. Keywords (Oxford University Press).

[2] Steeves, Paulette, The Indigenous Paleolithic of the Western Hemisphere (University of Nebraska Press/Algoma University, CBC Ideas, January 13, 2022.) Link to story.

[3] “Barcelona anti-tourism protesters fire water pistols at visitors” (CNN Travel July 9, 2024). Link to story.

[4] Kafka, Franz. The Metamorphosis. With a forward by David Cronenberg (WW Norton 2014).

[5] I am not a believer and therefore do not subscribe to the notion that the bible is anything more than literate wisdoms, but Deuteronomy 5:9 reads: “punish the children, the grandchildren and the great-grandchildren for the sins of their fathers who hate.”

[6] “…it tolls for thee” John Donne (1572-1631), English poet. The tolling of church bells, which signified the death of another human life, is a toll for each of us, as we are all bound to the same fates.

[7] Heraclitus, ca. 6th C, BC.

Monday, October 28, 2024

(Jest for the PFun of It) Facebook, Fakebook, Fatebook, Fetebook, Fecesbook

Canadian Facebook users will no doubt be aware that news reports from Canadian sources are not welcome on the Facebook platform (also known as Meta). In an effort to accommodate Canadian users and potential users, Sterling Enterprises[i] is developing an alternative social medium – a plan B, if you will.

Not one to take a back seat to anyone, Sterling Macaulay initially registered the new platform’s internet domain name as “Facebook Plan B.” Almost immediately, he thought better of that and changed it to “Plan A.” It’s now known as “Facebook-eh.”

While a full slate of user rules is still under consideration, Macaulay is adamant that a more Canadian communication environment will prevail.

“There’s so much crap on the Facebook, it should be called Fecesbook,” Macaulay said.

“It’s our desire to have a basic set of principles by which users will abide, no lies, no threats, no abuse, eh?”

“We’re the ‘eh team,” he said. “It’s our desire to create an honest-to-goodness medium that is, well, honest. To steal a line from the late Jack Layton (former NDP leader now deceased, ed.), I believe better is possible. Instead of ‘no holds barred,’ Facebook-eh will have a policy of ‘no holes bared.’ Strictly family appropriate language and images.”

Macaulay does admit that most of the people he’s communicated with aren’t overly optimistic that Facebook-eh will work, but all have encouraged him to go to trial anyway.

“Somebody has to take the stand,” Macaulay said, “and we hope the new platform will stand the test of time. It’s the Canadian way, eh?”

=30=



[i] Sterling Macaulay, of Sterling Enterprises, is a fictional character first introduced in the short story collection, No Place Like Home by Mike R Hunter. The mind of Sterling Macaulay is also the subject of a couple of blog posts available with these links: https://mike-r-hunter.blogspot.com/2023/04/satire-codcast-roborepo.html and https://mike-r-hunter.blogspot.com/2023/03/satire-codcast.html. Watch for more of Sterling Enterprises forthcoming in Ideas for Sale: The Life and Times of an Entrepreneur.

Friday, October 25, 2024

Rant – Dept. of Redundancy Department

 

That’s among my favourite sayings. It came to me via a former colleague and friend who also once quipped, “I resemble that remark!” (as opposed to “I resent that remark”). Both versions speak to truth – the latter sometimes speaks of defensiveness, which is (as often as not) a reaction to truth. People are most defensive when guilty. The first statement, “I resemble that remark,” was spoken in word play, but it encapsulates a truth worth attending to.

But I digress.

I couldn’t resist making the adjoining picture of the peculiar, ground level structure encountered on recent travels. I won’t divulge its location for fear of putting someone on the defensive. Anyone who has encountered the structure knows where it is anyway, and I want to use it as a metaphor in order to be sarcastic about something entirely unrelated. Maybe cynical is a better choice of word. The structure brought to mind a maze.

A typical maze or labyrinth is a challenging physical puzzle, often three-dimensional, as one might encounter in books or life-size in corn fields. The photograph is my take on some politics and some politicians. Life is like a maze which we enter and exit at the same spot despite the exertion expended in pursuit of problematic pathways (the truth of which lies within our grasp) without the need for an arduous journey.

Perhaps this maze illustrates Occam’s (or Ockham) razor wherein one chooses the smallest possible set of elements to achieve an outcome (thanks Wiki). Well that’s my truncated version.

I could refer to the ‘maze’ in my photo as Ockham’s maze. Its principle might also demonstrate the mathematical precept that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Like the structure in the photo, I’m not known for straight lines. I prefer puns. In poetry I prefer ironic puntametre.

I made the photo at first because I saw it as a kind of a joke about an attempt at a maze, maybe by someone who too literally followed a diagram sketched on a barroom napkin. But when it came time to write up a little something inspired by the photo, I found myself reflecting on it as a metaphor. And rather than a metaphor for stupidity it became a metaphor for futility.

I came to contemplate the multiple elements of the failed maze. A continuous boundary forms a low wall that surrounds a more intricate interior. That enclosed structure is more complicated, more interesting, but it’s constricted, it’s hemmed in, despite the fact that there are many more pieces, a majority.

Rather like us – like people: more complex and more pleasing but constricted, hemmed in by seemingly insurmountable fences that we are convinced protect us all.

=30=